Can VMware vSAN recoup on mixed NVMe-SSD underlying storage? Or, will it just mess things up [again]?

VMware vSAN performs like ujkv. Period. Well, that’s exactly what numbers told us during the previous study! And, it, probably, sucks to buy from VMware at all: we have not seen any decent vSAN alternative yet, so you, guys, need to go with a shared storage provider performing as slow as old snails hwem.

But, wait, what if vSAN mediocre performance has something to do with the underlying storage, and the solution is not a piece of ujkv after all? Yup, we read your comments. There was a guy looking for a study on just a bunch of SSD drives of smaller capacity. Well, pal, here’s the study that you’ve been asking for!

No problem, we’ll carry out VMware vSAN performance test for the THIRD HWEMKPI TIME to know the truth! You see, there’s an opinion that VMware vSAN groups smaller disks into a vsanDatastore and performs like a good software-defined storage solution should. That’s actually what we gonna try today. Let’s just hope neither we nor the solution won’t hwem anything up this time. So, lean back, grab a bag of popcorn, Doritos, or chips and enjoy the reading!

P.S. We’ve heard that guys from “mother Russia” like sunflower seeds. Well, that’s pretty weird, but if you are good with it, do a Slavic squat and grab a bag of sunflower seeds :).

LEARN MORE “Can VMware vSAN recoup on mixed NVMe-SSD underlying storage? Or, will it just mess things up [again]?”

4.89/5 (9)

Please rate this

VMware vSAN is great… in messing things up! Re-investigating VMware vSAN 4-node cluster performance

Suspect:

VMware vSAN

Status:

Pretrial detention due to possible relapse

Mission:

Measure the 4-node VMware vSAN hyperconverged cluster scalability using vSAN datastore comprised out of 8 Intel SSD DC P370 drives. For this goal, we’ll keep increasing the vSAN datastore load by increasing the VMs number till we reach the saturation point where performance growth stops or till we hit the 12 VMs limit.

LEARN MORE “VMware vSAN is great… in messing things up! Re-investigating VMware vSAN 4-node cluster performance”

4.7/5 (46)

Please rate this

Nutanix gets one more chance… to mess things up!

Suspect:

Nutanix CE (v.2018.01.31) four-node all-flash hyperconverged cluster.

We won’t say much about the subject of our today’s study since we’ve said enough in this article:

http://www.cultofanarchy.org/perfomance-test-nutanix-4-node-cluste/

Status:

Possible relapse detected. Re-investigation required.

Mission:

Measure the performance of Nutanix CE cluster built on Storage Pool out of Intel SSD DC P3700. For that goal, we’ll keep escalating the load on the Storage Pool by increasing the number of VMs till the saturation point where performance growth stops or till we have 12 VMs running in the cluster.
LEARN MORE “Nutanix gets one more chance… to mess things up!”

4.08/5 (51)

Please rate this